CHATPRIVACYDONATELOGINREGISTER
DMT-Nexus
FAQWIKIHEALTH & SAFETYARTATTITUDEACTIVE TOPICS
What if counsciousness is undecidable? Options
 
dragonrider
#1 Posted : 4/22/2020 7:14:26 PM

DMT-Nexus member

Moderator

Posts: 2197
Joined: 09-Jul-2016
Last visit: 20-Nov-2020
Location: spacetime
Suppose counsciousness is something we'll never understand. Suppose it is something that could never, ever be properly understood.
Suppose we would never be able to determine whether counsciousness is a material phenomenon or not.

What would the philosophical consequence of that be?

Would it demonstrate that counsciousness must be the foundation of reality?

I don't know. Somehow it strikes me as plausible, but i can't realy put my finger on it why that is.
Something like "because if this would be the case, that would be the only explanation left".
 

Good quality Syrian rue (Peganum harmala) for an incredible price!
 
downwardsfromzero
#2 Posted : 4/22/2020 10:04:28 PM

Peeing into the abyss

Chemical expertSenior Member

Posts: 5164
Joined: 30-Aug-2008
Last visit: 25-Nov-2020
Location: square root of minus one
Seeing as consciousness is our fundamental tool for experiencing and understanding things, trying to understand consciousness through using consciousness is like trying to fix a tool using the the self same tool. Perhaps this explains why we understand things better through changing our perspective in various ways.
Ora, lege, lege, lege, relege et labora

“There is a way of manipulating matter and energy so as to produce what modern scientists call 'a field of force'. The field acts on the observer and puts him in a privileged position vis-à-vis the universe. From this position he has access to the realities which are ordinarily hidden from us by time and space, matter and energy. This is what we call the Great Work."
― Jacques Bergier, quoting Fulcanelli
 
GoneWiththeWind
#3 Posted : 4/25/2020 7:12:52 PM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 60
Joined: 10-Sep-2018
Last visit: 10-Nov-2020
Or- it’s an illusion. Consciousness is represented by physical processes without actually being real. It may never be solved because it’s possible that it doesn’t exist in the first place, at least not in the way that we think it does.

https://aeon.co/essays/w...on-created-by-your-brain
 
null24
#4 Posted : 4/25/2020 8:43:00 PM

not a derogatory robot


Posts: 3484
Joined: 21-Jul-2012
Last visit: 24-Nov-2020
It seems like a more multi disciplinary approach is needed to understand consciousness, possibly than could ever produce a working model based on measurements and a stable theory other than materialism that could ever be accepted by 'rational' science.

Are we talking about human consciousness or the question of it in other organisms as well, i.e. it's nature in living things? Is it phenomenon of intelligence or simply if being? I'd say the latter, judging on my understanding of my cat, but others would disagree and say the little four-legger operates on pure instinct and need for survival.

Are we talking about the mechanism, it's processes, which seem to be material in nature, or it's result, which is most definitely immaterial? Coming up with a working theory on the two things are bridged is way above my pay grade, that said it seems like it's a question that can be tangled with, but will take a much larger toolset than the one currently in use to analyze it and also require the cooperation of multidisciplinary fields more than most questions, and maybe even a new definition of scientific process since by nature it is doubtful that certain parameters will ever be "measured" and will have to be accepted. It seems unavoidable to stay into realms of metaphysics to bridge the complexity of the problem, and that kind of sucks for science.

If that's impossible to reconcile then no, it will never be defined nor decided satisfactorily for academia and that seems to me too be some real job security for philosophers.

Then again there's the idea that if one discovered the Meaning of Life, then it would be meaningless to continue living.
Sine experientia nihil sufficienter sciri potest -Roger Bacon
*γνῶθι σεαυτόν*
decrimART
 
Quetzal7
#5 Posted : 4/25/2020 10:28:36 PM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 108
Joined: 08-Aug-2015
Last visit: 24-Nov-2020
Yes, this is the Great Mystery !
And this hypothesis - that it is undecidable - has huge consequences indeed ; First one, you stop freezing your beleives (materialist, reductivist, spiritual ... ) in one way or another, and by keeping this piece of puzzle kind of loose, undecided, the puzzle become a dynamic ; and a new space where concepts and certainties can dissolve get created ; a place of silence that describes consciousness with more eloquence than any philosopher will ever do.
 
BundleflowerPower
#6 Posted : 7/30/2020 3:33:17 AM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 1014
Joined: 12-Jul-2014
Last visit: 23-Nov-2020
Location: On the world in time
[quote=GoneWiththeWind]Or- it’s an illusion. Consciousness is represented by physical processes without actually being real. It may never be solved because it’s possible that it doesn’t exist in the first place, at least not in the way that we think it does.

https://aeon.co/essays/w...n-created-by-your-brain[/quote]

What is real then? Was it real that you typed that? And that’s the thing, it seemed real enough to me.
 
5 Dimensional Nick
#7 Posted : 8/29/2020 6:09:19 AM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 235
Joined: 12-May-2013
Last visit: 29-Aug-2020
Location: Nodnol
dragonrider wrote:
Suppose counsciousness is something we'll never understand. Suppose it is something that could never, ever be properly understood.
Suppose we would never be able to determine whether counsciousness is a material phenomenon or not.

What would the philosophical consequence of that be?

Would it demonstrate that counsciousness must be the foundation of reality?

I don't know. Somehow it strikes me as plausible, but i can't realy put my finger on it why that is.
Something like "because if this would be the case, that would be the only explanation left".


deep.

and everyone's replys.

really made me think.... therefor i am?

personally I feel although i like to believe in lots of logic beyond Descartes initial axiom for truth, that it is the only provably true thing and impossible to use as the foundation of any arguments/science or belief systems WHATSOEVER!
"With every thought word and deed, each individual sets forth influence in their surroundings which is subject to no barriers and reaches every level of creation"

".....its our responsibility to uplift the consciousness of the ENTIRE fucking world......" Saul Williams, DJ Krust tune.
 
muladharma
#8 Posted : 11/20/2020 9:10:10 PM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 117
Joined: 03-Jun-2017
Last visit: 21-Nov-2020
My take, FWIW:

https://en.wikipedia.org...oes_not_imply_causation ... very relevant for network-like systems. I find it hard to concieve that information travels from left to right, or bottom up, in a brain. A perceptual stimuli could echo everywhere, or nowhere, depending on attention and a number of factors that could be too complex to discuss.

Another highly complex system that is very hard to draw conclusions from is genetics inference, which has many feedback loops and cross interactions. Neurochemistry, pharmacology...

The subject and related perspectives are shared in this article:
Cognitive Neuroscience and Causal Inference: Implications for Psychiatry https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00129

...and possibly many others.
Find the wisdom to practice loving-kindness.
 
 
Users browsing this forum
Guest

DMT-Nexus theme created by The Traveler
This page was generated in 0.020 seconds.