S33K3R42X wrote:20gs is a solid dose with 3g rue.
If you are looking for intense dmt visuals. ACRB will disappoint. And even with an maoi present, the visual aspect is low and trying acacia without maoi for effect was a waste. For a good healthy therapeutic experience 20g ACRB 3g rue made into a tea will do the trick. But not a traditional aya.
Whoa whoa whoa - I understand you're pulling honest information from your experience - but be careful claiming absolutes from one experience! You either have root bark with low DMT content or your preparation method did not allow the full alkaloid content to make it into your brew.
Quality AC root bark, properly prepared, won't disappoint - not visually, mentally, not in any aspect. It has been shown to have a good % of DMT time and time again in extractions. 1.2% is a fair yield, and going off of that, if someone with quality ACRB who didn't know any better were to find your post and make a proper brew using the information you state here (20-25g ACRB) they could be ingesting 240-300mg DMT...
That is way too much even for most seasoned veterans. I've never heard of anyone taking a dose like that with an MAOI. I have heard of doses like that being taken
without an MAOI - but with an MAOI, that is seriously dangerous.
It is extremely important - not just in this field but in life in general - to not make such absolute claims from one experience. There are many variables to account for. I can tell that you have a desire to contribute to the community and the knowledge base - and that is awesome. That's always welcomed. But if you are interested in investigating these variables and different experiences in a way that allows you to contribute to the knowledge base,
you have to truly investigate and experiment and research. Even just a small amount of research should reveal that ACRB is a very viable option for an oral ayahuasca analogue, and that the doses required - again, with quality root bark and with proper method - are far less than you state here. 10g can blow one's world and ego to smithereens with 3g of rue.
I hope I'm not coming across too harshly, or something. Like I said, it's obvious you want to contribute and report back from your experiences with information others can use. That's great. And I know that putting all of that effort into your report to get a response like this may be a disappointment. But you have to make sure this information is solid...safe...reliable...etc. I see this kind of thing a lot on the internet and in life in general - where people have a small number of experiences with little investigation of the subject matter, preparation methods, other variables etc and start stating things as facts when they are actually just happenings, conclusions drawn from a tiny amount of data, etc - and all it does is bring very distorted information to the table, muddying up the waters at the least - and at most, putting others health and safety at risk.
But all that aside, welcome to the nexus!