Welcome to the Nexus!

I would like to point out that, while it is interesting that people have their own views of the world and that they share it here, this is no place for preaching or for telling others what the universe is about.

We are all humans with limits, spiritual children with a long way to go ahead of us, each one with our own potentials and skills, and also with our own weak points and things we have to get better at. Nobody here is claiming The Truth, or the monopoly over how the universe works.

So if you'd like to be here, I hope you understand that this attitude we follow is of utmost importance, since it is part of the basic agreements of being in this community. Things like saying "To me it seems things are...." or "I think ....", or "I speculate....", is way more adjusted than saying "The universe IS ... "

Now changing subject, and since this is your introduction essay, have you smoked dmt yet? What about taking it orally? What is your experience with extractions in general? What about with other psychedelics?

Godsarepeople: Can you cite a credible source for this?


Kind regards,

The Traveler

To be fair, the OP stated in the second sentence that this is "how I see everything." It would make painful reading if every single sentence was prefaced with "in my opinion." He stated early on that this is how he sees things based on his own experiences and wrote in that vein. No need for "credible sources" (one man's credible source is another man's official lie) when he stated very clearly that this is how HE sees things. "In my opinion," the immediate backlash against new members demanding things be written in a clunky fashion with b.s. source material for every little statement turns off a lot of people (and I suppose that's the point).

First off, what do Gigantism Spirits experience when/if they smoalk DMT

Welcome to the Nexus! Enjoyed reading through it - I hope you do not find it offensive but I find this a most entertaining account; like string theory, it's aesthetically appealing at the very least.

Interested to see your views elsewhere on the site, please post away.

I don’t think you read the post closely enough – here’s from the first section:



And the post ended with this:



Doesn’t sound like someone expressing an “opinion” to me.

PS: you may want to withhold talking about this if you ever find yourself in a psychologist or psychiatrist's office. They might find your statements indicative of "delusions of grandeur", and I'm sure there are plenty of labels in the DSM-IV that could be applied here.

welcome Godsarepeople, you sound like a strong character.
I would also enjoy reading something about 'your' life and the things in it now as an introduction of your 'self'? How you relate to Entheogenics for example.
You will find some very knowledgable and powerfull entities here also......
I might ask, at your invitation, a couple of questions,

Why do you associate yourself with DMT or Entheogens at this time ?
Are you familiar with LSD or psychodelic mushrooms ?
What data have you to collected ?

see you around

My favorite book, we are all in it somewhere, just some are more easy to find, hahaha

True - and the people who are aware that they are in there are more interesting anyways. Who would you rather have as your friend - Randall Patrick McMurphy or Nurse Mildred Ratched?

How about Jack Torrance...?


but seriously... where does Xeno come in in this whole story...?

So what? I mean, really, we all know this is how he views the world. You view the world your way, I view it my way, and no amount of "facts" will change that because "facts" are rather slippery things that change with our perception.

Can you not just read someone's views, absorb them whether they have value to your cemented views or not, and move on, without this reactionary demand that everything be stated with a "news" source (like that give credence to ANYthing: would you believe the OP's account if it were reported on CNN? FOX? ABC, NBC, CSPAN? Or some medical journal or double-blind, peer-reviewed blah blah blah?)

I think we're all adults here and can read critically, not taking everything so freakin' seriously, demanding "proof" for one's inner world.

By the way: "These memories have manifested in me to the point where its become total reality for me now". Again he states his views are FOR HIM, not absolute fact. Perhaps it is you who have not read closely enough.

I found your theory very interesting whether you have any proof of it or not and would love to read more.Post away can't wait to read it.Don't let anybody here discourage you from posting more.

^^^ what SHe said, and please post elsewhere on the forum.

A few things I would like to ask:

What do you mean by dream sequence? As far as I can google it is a technique used in storytelling.

What science did you study?

What kind of data have you been collecting?

What are these spirits made of? If the altered state is still bound by the physical laws then it must be made of matter which would be affected by these laws.

Could some spirits reach other galaxies if they travelled long enough?

How do these spirits propel themselves?

Would they have trouble navigating through the Kuiper Belt on their way out of our solar system?

Correct me if I misunderstood, the offspring of a threesome between 2 Gigantism Spirits and a particular cloud is a black hole. What are the offspring of just 2 Spirits without the cloud?

Do the Spirits have different genders? If so how many?

When the spirits travel inside their offspring what do they visit?

What do you mean by 'our group of people at the time close to the Big Bang'? As far as I know we people have only been around for a few hundred thousand years, billions of years after the big bang.

You say 'matter is broken down at the end of the universe and a HUGE BLACK HOLE opens up'. Is this huge black hole the offspring of Spirits even larger than the Gigantisms? And does there need to be a special clould involved? Is any matter broken down when regular Gigantisms make black hole offspring?

As a Gigantism Spirit with vast memory/knowledge of where you've been, could you perhaps point out which planets have intelligent life so we can point our exobiologists in the right direction? That would surely be awesome and may be the help that our group needs in order to branch out into more terrestrial life.

I’ve made no mention of what I think of the OP’s views. I was simply pointing out that he didn’t qualify his statements in the way you claimed.

My post was directed toward you, not the OP.

The OP began with “…how I see everything, and how the universe works.” This is not the same as saying “…how I see everything and how I think/believe/imagine the universe works”. It’s a subtle difference, but your defense of the OP, on the basis that he properly qualified his statements, is incorrect.

You imply that qualifying statements of this sort is an awkward and cumbersome exercise, but I disagree. For example, is it so much harder to say “This is my overall view of the universe and it goes like:” instead of “This is an overall view of the universe and it goes like:”?

welcome Godsarepeople, I'm convinced a subset of the Nexus will enjoy reading your revelations.

Not at all. I post clear qualifiers when applicable. BUT. Is it so hard to overlook harmless posts that don't religiously qualify every sentence? For example: to say "I am channeling the sixth-density Pleiadian entity BeefTron" (Instead of "I think I am channeling . . " it is implied that this can neither be proven nor unproven.

Though, were one to say: "If you mix caapi vine with a pot brownie, you'll reach an advanced spiritual state unparalleled" (instead of, "I reached a state of . . .", this is an obvious opinion, and while you will not be harmed by mixing the two (I assume, I've never done it), it should be clearly qualified as an opinion, not fact.

You see the difference?

And I would say that "This is How Everything in the Universe Works" is a much stronger, eye-catching title than saying: "This is My View of How Everything in the Universe Works."
No one cares. State it as fact and you catch more readers: it is an effective literary technique.

But stating it as fact when it is not is just wrong. Furthermore, it comes off in a preaching manner, and many here don't appreciate preaching. Sure, diversity of opinion and thought is appreciated and encouraged, but it is not encouraged nor appreciated to come off as someone who knows the ultimate truth while everyone else does not. Generally, when I see people come out like that it rubs me off, and when they do so in a public forum they should expect some reactions and criticism.

Anyway, I don't think we should slide off on a tangent and hijack a thread for discussing this. The mods have already expressed their opinions on this, so let's leave it be.