We've Moved! Visit our NEW FORUM to join the latest discussions. This is an archive of our previous conversations...

You can find the login page for the old forum here.
CHATPRIVACYDONATELOGINREGISTER
DMT-Nexus
FAQWIKIHEALTH & SAFETYARTATTITUDEACTIVE TOPICS
snorting Options
 
polytrip
#1 Posted : 8/21/2008 3:58:07 PM
DMT-Nexus member

Senior Member

Posts: 4639
Joined: 16-May-2008
Last visit: 24-Dec-2012
Location: A speck of dust in endless space, like everyone else.
How much different is snorted DMT as a salt, from freebase DMT?
 

Explore our global analysis service for precise testing of your extracts and other substances.
 
lorax
#2 Posted : 9/10/2008 4:36:56 PM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 686
Joined: 29-Jul-2008
Last visit: 19-Sep-2013
Location: Western Spiral arm of the Galaxy
my guess would be that the freebase tickles your nose more..
I am the Lorax. I speak for the trees. I speak for the trees, for the trees have no tongues. And I'm asking you, sir, at the top if my lungs.. (all posts are fictional and are intended for entertainment purpose only)
 
69ron
#3 Posted : 9/11/2008 2:29:42 AM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 5826
Joined: 09-Jun-2008
Last visit: 08-Sep-2010
Location: USA
The freebase is a little stronger, comes on a little faster and burns like hell.

The salt forms (depending on which salt form) are generally a little weaker, come on slower, last a little longer, have a little more bodily effects, and don't burn nearly as much.

The same is true for 5-MeO-DMT even when taken sublingually. While freebase 5-MeO-DMT burns your mouth like hell, 5-MeO-DMT fumarate doesn’t burn your mouth at all, not even a little tiny bit, it also comes on slower, has more bodily effects, and lasts a little longer. 5-MeO-DMT fumarate is far more euphoric than freebase DMT.

Salt forms of drugs normally take longer to absorb than freebase drugs and tend to have more bodily effect than mental effects. For an extreme example of this phenomenon, when freebase 5-HO-DMT is smoked it produces very strong visuals with light body effects, but when 5-HO-DMT HCl is smoked it produces lots of nausea, strong euphoria,
and very few visuals.

The same is likely true for LSD. SWIM has never tried freebase LSD sublingually before. LSD tartrate, like 5-MeO-DMT fumarate, rapidly absorbs sublingually. It should absorb faster as freebase, especially in the presence of a base like calcium carbonate. If you mix 200 micrograms of freebase LSD with 100 mg of calcium carbonate and take that sublingually, the freebase LSD should come on REALLY FAST because the calcium carbonate will keep it in freebase form allowing it to absorb faster. The effects should also be far more visual than oral LSD, and it should produce almost no bodily effects. It’s worth a try. But SWIM hasn’t seen real LSD in over 10 yearsSad

SWIM has lots of LSA ascorbate and would like to try freebase LSH sublingually. It should theoretically be more visual, come on faster, and have fewer side effects that way. I imagine when SWIM has a full day to himself, he’ll try that. For the experiment, you’d mix 4 drops of mint oil with the LSA and maybe 4 drops of water. Mix for about 1 minute to form LSH from the LSA, and then mix that with 100 mg of calcium carbonate (a common calcium supplement) to freebase the LSH. Then take that sublingually immediately before it decomposes. Let it sit for 10 minute in the mouth and then spit it out so none gets absorbed in the stomach.
You may remember me as 69Ron. I was suspended years ago for selling bunk products under false pretenses. I try to sneak back from time to time under different names, but unfortunately, the moderators of the DMT-Nexus are infinitely smarter than I am.

If you see me at the waterpark, please say hello. I'll be the delusional 50 something in the American flag Speedo, oiling up his monster guns while responding to imaginary requests for selfies from invisible teenage girls.
 
 
Users browsing this forum
Guest

DMT-Nexus theme created by The Traveler
This page was generated in 0.012 seconds.