We've Moved! Visit our NEW FORUM to join the latest discussions. This is an archive of our previous conversations...

You can find the login page for the old forum here.
CHATPRIVACYDONATELOGINREGISTER
DMT-Nexus
FAQWIKIHEALTH & SAFETYARTATTITUDEACTIVE TOPICS
PREV12
Signatures Options
 
smokeydaze
#21 Posted : 12/7/2009 5:25:33 AM

Dragunov Mylshka Teapot


Posts: 1029
Joined: 12-Jun-2008
Last visit: 26-May-2023
Location: Sydney
Touche Guevara wrote:
D_Juggz wrote:
What is a good disclaimer sig i can use?
I feel bad copying other people's...

I just want one that says, take anything I say as fictional/hypothetical.

I'd be surprised if a disclaimer sig was ever the deciding factor in any legal proceedings.

It's been brought up a few times before.. but each to their own.
SMOKE MORE DMT, SMOKE MORE DMT NOW
 

STS is a community for people interested in growing, preserving and researching botanical species, particularly those with remarkable therapeutic and/or psychoactive properties.
 
kemist
#22 Posted : 12/7/2009 7:56:44 AM

John


Posts: 700
Joined: 31-Aug-2008
Last visit: 27-Jan-2024
Location: Highland
Darkbb wrote:
Alright.... who needs an avatar anyways. Should have said something sooner mayn I would have done something about it.

thanx mate I really appreciate it. Wish everybody will be so understandable.
As a kemist I never met ILPT in physical form and never talk to him. He share his wisdom, trough my mind, telepathicly only. Please don`t prosecute me, for his possible illegal activities. He is bonkers about chemistry and doesn`t even exist in this primitive reality !!!
 
shoe
#23 Posted : 12/8/2009 12:45:27 AM

DMT-Nexus member

New member

Posts: 1689
Joined: 18-Jan-2008
Last visit: 18-Apr-2015
Touche Guevara wrote:
D_Juggz wrote:
What is a good disclaimer sig i can use?
I feel bad copying other people's...

I just want one that says, take anything I say as fictional/hypothetical.

I'd be surprised if a disclaimer sig was ever the deciding factor in any legal proceedings.


ditto, but I always thought it would be funny to hear a lawyer explain to a judge:

lawyer: "yes, and in this exhibit we can see that, if we take the use of 'somone who ISNT me' loosely
mr X actually admits to xyz..."
judge: "except that he didn't."
lawyer: "yeah."
judge: "so, he's in the clear then?"
lawyer: "yeah, I guess so!"

or something to that effect. lmao
shoe

ॐ भूर्भुव: स्व: तत्सवितुर्वरेण्यं । भर्गो देवस्य धीमहि, धीयो यो न: प्रचोदयात्
Love, Gratittude, Compassion, Fearlessness!
 
PREV12
 
Users browsing this forum
Guest

DMT-Nexus theme created by The Traveler
This page was generated in 0.015 seconds.