We've Moved! Visit our NEW FORUM to join the latest discussions. This is an archive of our previous conversations...

You can find the login page for the old forum here.
CHATPRIVACYDONATELOGINREGISTER
DMT-Nexus
FAQWIKIHEALTH & SAFETYARTATTITUDEACTIVE TOPICS
D-Limonene vs. Xylene Options
 
Rideronthewheel
#1 Posted : 12/9/2012 10:44:07 PM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 49
Joined: 14-Nov-2012
Last visit: 16-May-2018
Hi all,

reading up about Q21Q21's Vinegar/Lime A/B Extraction Tek:

https://wiki.dmt-nexus.m...k#Alternative_Next-Steps

I like this method because, as it says, "Jimjam" is a "full-spectrum product" that includes alkaloids and 'flavors' that pure white, Naphtha-obtained, DMT doesn't . So that's intriguing on its own (is it true?) Secondly, the materials needed can be 100% food-safe and non-toxic. That's a big plus for me at least.

The only variable in the tek's materials list is D-Limonene or Xylene as the solvent. Both absorb more than Naphtha, apparently, but I'm wondering which is better for the chemistry. I'd prefer to use a non-toxic chemical, but if Xylene is more effective at absorbing DMT and the related alkaloids, I might use it instead.

Anybody know from experience?

Thanks
 

Good quality Syrian rue (Peganum harmala) for an incredible price!
 
benzyme
#2 Posted : 12/9/2012 10:51:10 PM

analytical chemist

Moderator | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expertExtreme Chemical expert | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expertChemical expert | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expertSenior Member | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expert

Posts: 7463
Joined: 21-May-2008
Last visit: 09-Aug-2025
Location: the lab
go with xylene. the xlogp of dmt is closer to that of xylene, it's more structurally similar because of the fully conjugated benzene ring. because of this, it doesn't need to be heated, nor are multiple extractions really necessary.

xylene isn't very toxic, just don't drink it.
"Nothing is true, everything is permitted." ~ hassan i sabbah
"Experiments are the only means of attaining knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." -Max Planck
 
Rideronthewheel
#3 Posted : 12/9/2012 11:47:24 PM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 49
Joined: 14-Nov-2012
Last visit: 16-May-2018
Thanks a lot benzyme. Xylene it will be then if I can in fact find any MHRB powder. Things don't look so good out there for buying in the U.S. anymore...
 
benzyme
#4 Posted : 12/9/2012 11:52:16 PM

analytical chemist

Moderator | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expertExtreme Chemical expert | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expertChemical expert | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expertSenior Member | Skills: Analytical equipment, Chemical master expert

Posts: 7463
Joined: 21-May-2008
Last visit: 09-Aug-2025
Location: the lab
tbh, I have no idea about the bark or where to procure it.
all I know is chemicals.

although, I did get some seeds to plant trees in the spring Big grin
"Nothing is true, everything is permitted." ~ hassan i sabbah
"Experiments are the only means of attaining knowledge at our disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." -Max Planck
 
Parshvik Chintan
#5 Posted : 12/10/2012 12:06:53 AM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 3207
Joined: 19-Jul-2011
Last visit: 02-Jan-2023
they both work great.
i prefer limonene because i feel i am not even cautious enough with food-safe chems, and because if you are going to make your entire house reek, orange peel is a much better smell than xylene. my first extraction attempt was that same Q21Q21 tek and it came out great.
got a good harvest of potent red goopy jim-jam (it was just a small little 50g extract, but i got enough for a couple doses).

my second attempt and i got probably over 2%. my first pull was a 3.8 gram (from 1LB of mhrb) ball of dmt resin - and i ended up getting probably 2.5 times as much in oily goop which was too difficult to weigh - probably enough to last me a life time and there is still more left over to pull. i definitely got way more than 1% that is for sure.


also i think one tip that might have helped was that i waited at least week to do my first pull..
Q21Q21 wrote:
2 pulls done around 24 hours and 48 hours (or later) should be enough to get 80%-90% of the DMT (In my experience)


i found this to not be the case at all, my third pull was done probably a good 4 days after my first pull, and was the biggest of the entire extraction (and actually slightly more resinous and less oily than the second and latter pulls)

also when i added the limo to the basified bark, i stirred the hell out of it (as long as your material is moist, the limo will float on top of it) with a metal spoon until it took on a deep color change (from clear to yellowy-orange). i like to think it helped, it certainly didn't hurt.

also also i added an acid cook step at the beginning (i was using a glass container, so i let it sit in the oven at 195ºF for a good 2 hours before adding base)

best of luck to you in your extraction. extracting is even more addictive than ingesting, so be careful Razz
My wind instrument is the bong
CHANGA IN THE BONGA!
 
fractalelf
#6 Posted : 1/1/2013 4:47:59 PM
DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 18
Joined: 12-Aug-2012
Last visit: 25-Feb-2017
Location: Boston Metro, MA, USA
Parshvik Chintan wrote:
extracting is even more addictive than ingesting, so be careful Razz

I know this was made in a playful spirit, but there is so much ignorance and stupidity in our world, don't let yourself be misquoted!
For any stray visitor here who does not know already, ingesting ayahuasca and pharmahuasca is NOT addictive!
You can say about the physical act of extraction, on the other hand, anything you want. I say doing such chemistry gives one godlike euphoria! Big grin
 
jamie
#7 Posted : 1/1/2013 7:53:28 PM

DMT-Nexus member

Salvia divinorum expert | Skills: Plant growing, Ayahuasca brewing, Mushroom growingSenior Member | Skills: Plant growing, Ayahuasca brewing, Mushroom growing

Posts: 12340
Joined: 12-Nov-2008
Last visit: 02-Apr-2023
Location: pacific
Ive used both. There is no difference. If you want to get technical about it w/e have at it. Essentially for what we are doing there is no difference..other than xylene smells so bad you need to do it outside or have a fume hood..where limonene just smells like volatile orange oil..

Also if you are in an apartment or something using xylene can raise eyebrows..that stuff smells and if others smell it...

At this point some of the smoothest changa I have made came from sunflower oil..so go figure. People who say food grade teks dont produce nice spice prob just never tried or dont understand how to clean something.
Long live the unwoke.
 
PupilOfPerception
#8 Posted : 1/12/2013 5:41:04 AM

I'd rather have a bottle in front of me, than a frontal lobotomy.


Posts: 29
Joined: 09-Nov-2011
Last visit: 07-Feb-2023
Location: Solipsistic Virtual Machine
fractalelf wrote:
Parshvik Chintan wrote:
extracting is even more addictive than ingesting, so be careful Razz

I know this was made in a playful spirit, but there is so much ignorance and stupidity in our world, don't let yourself be misquoted!
For any stray visitor here who does not know already, ingesting ayahuasca and pharmahuasca is NOT addictive!

Actually, you can become addicted to just about anything if your personality is geared that way. To be precise, I'd say that they are not physically addicting. Psychological addiction is something else entirely.
Quote:
...if you see that it is inconceivable that anything should exist, it is evident that at least one inconceivable fact is there. That is to say, that which exists is not limited to the conceivable. Since the inconceivable is there, it is impossible to set any limit to the quantity of inconceivableness which may be present in the situation. Now were the existence of anything consistently to remind you of the fact of inconceivability...it would be impossible for you to feel in the same way about the conceivable. ...if anyone were reminded about the inconceivable by the fact of existence at all constantly, he would sooner or later have the perception that there may be inconceivable considerations which are inconceivably more important than any conceivable consideration could be. ...if you do have a perception that any conceivable consideration may be utterly invalidated by some other consideration which you do not know, and if you are reminded of this perception constantly by the fact that things exist, certain modifications take place in the way you feel about things. These modifications have not taken place in the psychology of most people.
- Celia Green
 
AfroHorror
#9 Posted : 1/19/2013 11:20:58 PM

Paradox Entity


Posts: 156
Joined: 06-Oct-2012
Last visit: 25-Aug-2013
Location: The Mirror
I started my first attempt at an extraction with xylene a few days ago. (my d-limonene arrived the next day ha ha)
I wanted to know, Would a mixture of the two solvents have any effects on the extraction?
Would re-using the vinegar [acid wash/salting] make a more concentrated solution?
The Code Was Written In Blood
When the People Fear the Government there is Tyranny, When the Government Fears the People there is Liberty Thomas Jefferson
I AM THE HARDEST AND THE SOFTEST, WE ARE ONE.
 
Parshvik Chintan
#10 Posted : 1/20/2013 3:04:28 AM

DMT-Nexus member


Posts: 3207
Joined: 19-Jul-2011
Last visit: 02-Jan-2023
AfroHorror wrote:
Would re-using the vinegar [acid wash/salting] make a more concentrated solution?

the vinegar would come close to saturation so it probably wouldn't absorb as much as new fresh vinegar.

as far as mixing limo and xylene, i don't think it would be any different then limonene by itself (i think xylene might be slightly more selective, but not mixed with limo), but it would make the xylene smell better(probably).
My wind instrument is the bong
CHANGA IN THE BONGA!
 
 
Users browsing this forum
Guest (2)

DMT-Nexus theme created by The Traveler
This page was generated in 0.029 seconds.