We've Moved! Visit our NEW FORUM to join the latest discussions. This is an archive of our previous conversations...

You can find the login page for the old forum here.
CHATPRIVACYDONATELOGINREGISTER
DMT-Nexus
FAQWIKIHEALTH & SAFETYARTATTITUDEACTIVE TOPICS
No Seperation Options
 
abracadabraX3
#1 Posted : 6/18/2019 11:32:09 PM
This is interesting SWIM thought. SWIM used:

ACRB TEK 100g "PICS" (Newbie Friendly)
https://www.dmt-nexus.me...aspx?g=posts&t=58064

And has been having amazing results. SWIM decided to up it to 200g with just a little more water in the acid stage.

After basic soup tho there was very minimal separation with the solvent. It hardly separated after sitting for 30min. The volume was still raising tho like it was trapped underneath.

Is this a density issue?

SWIM

At 150g the process was still pretty flawless and yielded very well but 200g seems to be overkill.
“Under, and back of, the Universe of Time, Space and Change, is ever to be found The Substantial Reality-the Fundimental Truth.”
The Kybalion
 
downwardsfromzero
ModeratorChemical expert
#2 Posted : 6/19/2019 10:09:45 PM
Ugg, "SWIM"- puh-lease!

Quote:
Is this a density issue?

Sounds as though the solvent is getting trapped in the bark particulates because you've increased the amount of solid without adding sufficient water to make up for this.

This is the classic scaling up trap in action!




“There is a way of manipulating matter and energy so as to produce what modern scientists call 'a field of force'. The field acts on the observer and puts him in a privileged position vis-à-vis the universe. From this position he has access to the realities which are ordinarily hidden from us by time and space, matter and energy. This is what we call the Great Work."
― Jacques Bergier, quoting Fulcanelli
 
blue.magic
#3 Posted : 6/20/2019 1:11:39 PM
You can probably push the density up a bit but then you start getting emulsions, trapped solvent (as downwardsformzero pointed) and loss of yield. Better use more water than less.
 
Jagube
#4 Posted : 6/20/2019 4:18:24 PM
What if one was doing a drytek, i.e. no water in the basic material, and an NPS added to that? Would that create an even bigger mess (NPS with solid particulates suspended in it and not separating) or would it solve the problem completely and allow for perfect separation?

This supposedly (?) works with IPA, would it still work with an NPS?
 
pastanostra
#5 Posted : 6/21/2019 8:24:20 PM
Jagube wrote:
What if one was doing a drytek, i.e. no water in the basic material, and an NPS added to that? Would that create an even bigger mess (NPS with solid particulates suspended in it and not separating) or would it solve the problem completely and allow for perfect separation?

This supposedly (?) works with IPA, would it still work with an NPS?


Drytek is like a cake, so the solvent can't be mixed with basic liquid because there is no such liquid.
From my experience, the cake agglomerate in small chunks but not infinite small particles.
But i allways filter the solvent from it to be sure
 
 
Users browsing this forum
Guest

DMT-Nexus theme created by The Traveler
This page was generated in 0.016 seconds.