That's a kind of refreshing question
Scaling down is probably safer than scaling up in terms of how the arithmetic works out. You will have to be utterly methodical in your working process because any losses will be of greater significance. All equipment needs to be smaller to minimise losses through surface adhesion, and the amount of DMT held up in the naphtha post freeze precipitation will also be more significant if you use anything but the minimum necessary amount.
Adding water to the bark will likely also require your special attention because you are dealing with a situation where there is an interplay between surface area and volume and these do not scale in the same way. I suspect you may have to add a little more water than the mathematically scaled amount in order to achieve a workable consistency.
Why are you extracting such a tiny amount of bark? If you have even 25g available I'd suggest you use that amount - it will give a far more favorable balance between effort and reward.
“There is a way of manipulating matter and energy so as to produce what modern scientists call 'a field of force'. The field acts on the observer and puts him in a privileged position vis-à-vis the universe. From this position he has access to the realities which are ordinarily hidden from us by time and space, matter and energy. This is what we call the Great Work."
― Jacques Bergier, quoting Fulcanelli